2022-05-04 Met/Cat Meeting Minutes
Attendees
Dijana Kladnjakovic (Co-Chair), Humber College
Stacey Boileau (Co-Chair), OCLS
Irene Sillius, Sheridan College
Carrie Cousineau, St. Lawrence College
Tiffany Miller, Confederation College
Mary-Margaret Mirtsos, Centennial College
Najeeb Ahmed, Humber College
Angela Ashton, Lambton College
Danielle Emon, Consultant
Liana Giovando, OCLS
Aura Hill, OCLS
Guest: Lauren Rupert, OCLS
Regrets
Rosina Leung, Seneca College
Kit Robertson, Northern College
Mellissa Forget, St. Clair College
Sarah Gillard, George Brown College
Susan Lee, Conestoga College
Callen Retter, Confederation College
Jasper Romo, Georgian College
Kent Reynolds, Niagara College
Action Items
Compare bibliographic minimum standards for streaming audio with Primo VE requirements and see if we are matching the Primo VE requirements. Identify any specific differences.
Review streaming audio records, if any, in Audio Cine Films, Curio, and Criterion on Demand, - and see what is being done on top of the minimum standards on a local level.
Use the Backgrounder on Minimum Bibliographic Standards and https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/020Primo_VE/Primo_VE_(English)/120Other_Configurations/Mapping_to_the_Display%2C_Facets%2C_and_Search_Sections_in_the_Primo_VE_Record#Resource_Type_Mapping for your comparison.
Please capture notes/results/recommendations in the shared Excel/Google doc on the appropriate tab.
Discussion Items
Subcommittee Chair Update from ISC
The User Experience subcommittee is working on https://clo-collaboration-spaces.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CIS/pages/474349571 that was initially proposed by Met/Cat. It is in progress and will be shared.
Alma and Primo LibGuide has been launched. Consider where met/cat standards could be structured in this LibGuide.
Results of comparison bibliographic minimum standards for the streaming video with Primo VE requirements
Confederation is already aware that their records will not meet minimum standards. They would like to update records following Sheridan standards. They have looked at Sheridan records and those records are meeting minimum standards and Primo VE requirements, and the same for 3 collections reviewed.
Primo VE needs 6th and 7th character in leader and that is part of OCLS minimum standards, then the record will appear as “streaming” in Primo VE.
Danielle provides Ex Libris link with info about Primo VE requirements: https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/010Getting_Started/050Alma_User_Interface_%E2%80%93_General_Information/Searching_in_Alma#Rules_Used_to_Create_the_Resource_Type_Field_MARC_21_KORMARC_and_UNIMARC (does not cover match points, subject headings, etc. that still need to be considered)
They may also need to require 008 pos. 29=o,s,q (Sheridan has included this as well).
Dijana shows comparison table between CUC minimum standards and Primo VE recommendations to highlight the differences, such as new requirements, new options that need to be decided upon.
The subcommittee may want to focus on requirements, on what must a record have to be made, due to timelines. For example:
Using categories of Mandatory and Recommended
Mandatory could include leaders and subject headings, 008/29 as required, and 008/23 for streamed audio
Fields that are mandatory could be fields that are responsive to the user interface, that allow users to Find, Identify, Search & Obtain - improve the user experience.
The presentation of the standards could be done several ways. It is suggested to create the content first and then create a tool.
The subcommittee will use the CUC Requirement Excel table as starting point for developing content, but create separate tabs for different format types (print, streaming video, etc.) and adding column for Primo requirements/standards.
ACTION ITEM: Dijana and Stacey to enter streaming video standards in the new table by Friday and share with group.
ACTION ITEM: Everyone review and respond to new streaming video standards in table by Wed May 11.
ACTION ITEM: Everyone to do another record comparison like last week, but this time for streaming audio and use the table for your notes/results/recommendations.
A match point also needs to be recommended. Using 035 as a match point seems to be the best choice.
Alma will automatically create 035 by taking 003, put in brackets and put in front of 001 to make 035
Need to document that Alma creates 035 automatically (and how), as well as what happens if the 001 or 003 is blank. The recommendation is not to load records with blank fields. Also may need to consider what if the title is duplicated.
Evaluation of Connexion - Test Results
Dijana has some OCLC records in variety of formats with comparison results. The results table highlights show what is missing in terms of minimum requirements
Next steps: see if Sarah also have results to share, review results, and decide if it is a good source in Alma that the consortium would be useful/like to use.
ACTION ITEMS: Dijana will share results of review of OCLC records. Everyone to review and prepare for discussion at next meeting.
Any other business
ACTION ITEM: Aura to make meetings 90 mins
Deferred
Decision to set brief record rules in the NZ that will dictate the minimum required fields necessary in order for a new record to be contributed to the NZ (if a match is not found when running the linking job).
Questions that came out of Study Group:
Would like clarity on relationship between Local Tagging - Manual Bib Edits May Be Required, Network Zone and Local Fields Best Practices and Briefing Note 06 - Consortial Treatment of LC Subject Headings
Is there impact to colleges Migration Form?
Is moving 650 to 690 enough to preserve local heading or do we need another process to create a local authority file in the NZ (so other colleges could use subject headings)?
Planning for session on local fields and cataloguing in the consortium