Collaborative System and Shared Metadata Services & Support
Summary
This proposal speaks to OCLS’s anticipated role in centralized Metadata Management Services and coordination of the Network Zone to support and leverage collaborative efforts across all 24 colleges.
OCLS is proposing to act as a central body that actively supports metadata consistency in the college libraries, with a particular emphasis on the development and maintenance of high-quality, shared records within the system. This work will be done in conjunction with a standing Metadata Subcommittee.
Rationale
Ontario’s college libraries have contributed to a union catalogue (CUC) for several decades. The Network Zone will replace the CUC and act as a focal point (or hub) for activities related to the maintenance of shared records and standards.
In line with the CLSP goals for leveraging consortial activities for efficiency and cost savings, OCLS’s activities in the Network Zone will:
Improve user experience across all colleges by maintaining high quality records and consistent cataloguing practices
Reduce duplication of effort by individual libraries by centrally maintaining select shared eresource collections (e.g. streaming video collections)
Increase cataloguing efficiency at individual college libraries by providing a reliable source for copy cataloguing
Build capacity for metadata practices and local authority development by facilitating the creation and sharing of resources, tools, and training (e.g. to support college decolonizing efforts)
Facilitate resource sharing throughout the college library system (e.g. by supporting a Central Primo VE instance with the ability to expose all consortial holdings, and by seeking ways to share resources and records between colleges, including those outside the CLSP network zone)
Service Activities
Although activities may shift as we move past Go-Live to steady state, the table below outlines, at a high level, the activities that OCLS proposes as the foundation of its Metadata Management Services.
OCLS Activities
OCLS, in consultation and alignment with a standing Metadata Subcommittee, will take responsibility for these activities:
Activity | Notes |
|---|---|
General and ongoing maintenance of the NZ bibliographic records. | E.g. oversight of records coming in from Community Zone; oversight from Institution Zone; maximizing # of records coming in from Institution Zones |
Load and maintain records for selected electronic resource collections. | |
Create local electronic resource bib records where no viable options exist in the CZ. | |
Synch records with colleges outside Page 1+. | |
Support and maintain a central Primo VE view to expose consortial holdings. | |
Work with colleges to build a community of practice around developing and promoting cataloguing tools and standards. | For example, maintaining a cataloguing contract, consortial licence for OCLC’s Connexion, or another cataloguing tools/services such as RDA Toolkit. |
Work with colleges to develop consortial cataloguing policies and requirements. | |
Support onboarding college library staff responsible for copy cataloguing and loading bibliographic records in the shared system. | Requires guidelines for cataloguing permission levels |
Facilitate a training program to develop cataloguing expertise among the consortia in service of shared cataloguing policies and standards. | |
Establish and maintain rules and other shared tools based on the cataloguing policies and requirements that can be distributed to Institution Zones. | E.g. normalization, indication, match etc. |
Support the development and ongoing maintenance of shared local authority file in collaboration with the Page 1+ committees, CLO Indigenous Matters Committee, IPEC and college expertise. | for future consideration |
Develop best practices for ALMA-D for digital objects (MODS / DC). | for future consideration |
Dependencies:
In order for OCLS to provide this service, colleges need to commit to:
Participating in a NZ cataloguing group and program (to be formed)
Using the cataloguing tools developed, and following any adopted requirements, standards, policies and cataloguing permissions as determined by the Metadata Subcommittee
Cataloguing in the Network Zone
Advising which collections should be maintained centrally by OCLS
Access Requirements:
In order to perform services in the Network Zone OCLS will need:
Admin access to College IZs for troubleshooting purposes for linking and synching
Credentials or guest access to College SSO for access testing of eResources
Proposed Funding Model
The identified funding model represents OCLS’s best effort at determining how the costs to provide proposed services will be covered.
|
Out of Scope Activities
The Out of Scope table identifies key activities that the colleges/third parties will need to undertake. It is not meant to be an exhaustive list of all activities for the colleges, but rather to identify activities that OCLS will not perform.
Activity | Notes |
|---|---|
Updating existing IZ records to meet the minimum requirement of the NZ before linking | |
Running jobs in an IZ to link appropriate IZ records to the NZ | |
High level cataloguing activities (beyond CLO Metadata Standards requirement that requires individual title attention and research) such as record improvement, authority control and local authority creation | |
Managing MARC records for electronic collections that only individual colleges subscribe to or where it is not possible to access the records |
|
| |
Future Considerations:
Services could be expanded to include:
MODs or DC work for ALMA-D
Maintenance of a shared local authority file
Proposal Details
Drafted on: |
|
Prepared by: | Ontario Colleges Library Service |
Prepared for: | Metadata/Cataloguing Subcommittee |
Reviewed on: |
|
Finalized on: |
|