Attendees

1. Dijana Kladnjakovic (Co-Chair), Humber College

2. Stacey Boileau (Co-Chair), OCLS

3. Irene Sillius, Sheridan College

4. Mellissa Forget, St. Clair College

5. Sarah Gillard, George Brown College

6. Carrie Cousineau, St. Lawrence College

7. Susan Lee, Conestoga College

8. Rosina Leung, Seneca College

9. Kit Robertson, Northern College

10. Callen Retter, Confederation College

11. Tiffany Miller, Confederation College

12. Jasper Romo, Georgian College

13. Mary-Margaret Mirtsos, Centennial College

14. Najeeb Ahmed, Humber College

15. Angela Ashton, Lambton College

16. Kent Reynolds, Niagara College

17. Danielle Emon, Consultant

18. Liana Giovando, OCLS

19. Aura Hill, OCLS

Regrets

TBC

Action Items from Previous Meeting

• For all subcommittee members:

1. Compare bibliographic minimum standards for the audiovisual area with Primo VE requirements and see if we are matching the Primo VE requirements. Identify any specific differences.

2. Review and pay specific attention to 3 collections, Audio Cine Films, Curio, and Criterion on Demand - and see what is being done on top of the minimum standards on a local level.

Use the Backgrounder on Minimum Bibliographic Standards and https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/020Primo_VE/Primo_VE_(English)/120Other_Configurations/Mapping_to_the_Display%2C_Facets%2C_and_Search_Sections_in_the_Primo_VE_Record#Resource_Type_Mapping for your comparison.

Email the group or comment below with your findings to whole group by April 29. Stacey and Dijana will prepare summary of findings by May 4.

• Dijana Kladnjakovic will reach out to Sarah Gillard as she raised possible concern with this move and finalize the Network Zone and Local Fields Best Practices table.
• Dijana Kladnjakovic will bring the findings on OCLC records via Connexion to the next meeting.

Discussion Items

• Subcommittee Chair Update from ISC

• Evaluation of Connexion - Test Results (Susan/Sarah)

• Decision to set brief record rules in the NZ that will dictate the minimum required fields necessary in order for a new record to be contributed to the NZ (if a match is not found when running the linking job).

• Questions that came out of Study Group:

  • Would like clarity on relationship between Local Tagging - Manual Bib Edits May Be Required, Network Zone and Local Fields Best Practices and Briefing Note 06 - Consortial Treatment of LC Subject Headings

  • Is there impact to colleges Migration Form?

  • Is moving 650 to 690 enough to preserve local heading or do we need another process to create a local authority file in the NZ (so other colleges could use subject headings)?

• Planning for session on local fields and cataloguing in the consortium

• Any other business