Attendees
Dijana Kladnjakovic (Co-Chair), Humber College
Stacey Boileau (Co-Chair), OCLS
Irene Sillius, Sheridan College
Mellissa Forget, St. Clair College
Sarah Gillard, George Brown College
Carrie Cousineau, St. Lawrence College
Susan Lee, Conestoga College
Rosina Leung, Seneca College
Kit Robertson, Northern College
Callen Retter, Confederation College
Tiffany Miller, Confederation College
Jasper Romo, Georgian College
Mary-Margaret Mirtsos, Centennial College
Najeeb Ahmed, Humber College
Angela Ashton, Lambton College
Kent Reynolds, Niagara College
Danielle Emon, Consultant
Liana Giovando, OCLS
Aura Hill, OCLS
Regrets
TBC
Action Items from Previous Meeting
- For all subcommittee members:
Compare bibliographic minimum standards for the audiovisual area with Primo VE requirements and see if we are matching the Primo VE requirements. Identify any specific differences.
Review and pay specific attention to 3 collections, Audio Cine Films, Curio, and Criterion on Demand - and see what is being done on top of the minimum standards on a local level.
Use the Backgrounder on Minimum Bibliographic Standards and https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/020Primo_VE/Primo_VE_(English)/120Other_Configurations/Mapping_to_the_Display%2C_Facets%2C_and_Search_Sections_in_the_Primo_VE_Record#Resource_Type_Mapping for your comparison.
Email the group or comment below with your findings to whole group by April 29. Stacey and Dijana will prepare summary of findings by May 4.
- Dijana Kladnjakovic will reach out to Sarah Gillard as she raised possible concern with this move and finalize the Network Zone and Local Fields Best Practices table.
- Dijana Kladnjakovic will bring the findings on OCLC records via Connexion to the next meeting.
Discussion Items
Subcommittee Chair Update from ISC
Evaluation of Connexion - Test Results (Susan/Sarah)
Decision to set brief record rules in the NZ that will dictate the minimum required fields necessary in order for a new record to be contributed to the NZ (if a match is not found when running the linking job).
Questions that came out of Study Group:
Would like clarity on relationship between Local Tagging - Manual Bib Edits May Be Required, Network Zone and Local Fields Best Practices and Briefing Note 06 - Consortial Treatment of LC Subject Headings
Is there impact to colleges Migration Form?
Is moving 650 to 690 enough to preserve local heading or do we need another process to create a local authority file in the NZ (so other colleges could use subject headings)?
Planning for session on local fields and cataloguing in the consortium
Any other business