Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

  • The subcommittee has been renamed to User Experience (UX) from Discovery/Front End/Customer Service Subcommittee.

  • Review and approve Resource Sharing BN Briefing Note NN - Resource Sharing Model /wiki/spaces/CIS/pages/473333772

    • Since an agreement between all colleges to share patron data does not exist and there is limited time, the peer-to-peer model has been recommended. The choice can be changed but it is a two-month project with Ex Libris to reconfigure, with a cost. The fulfillment model designed for physical resource sharing and to be used at any location. From discussion in subcommittee, colleges were not overly concerned with physical resource sharing. Peer-to-peer does allow walk-in borrowing by creating a temporary patron record; is similar to the current process used by libraries. Peer-to-peer is a better model than fulfillment model for e-resource sharing. It will be staff facilitated for now.

    • How does peer-to-peer model interact with Rapido? https://exlibrisgroup.com/products/rapido-library-resource-sharing-platform/

  • DECISION: If it doesn’t prohibit us from using Rapido or other ILL systems, the ISC approves the Briefing Note NN - Resource Sharing Model /wiki/spaces/CIS/pages/473333772.

  • ACTION ITEM: Liana to confirm with Ex Libris that the peer-to-peer model does not prohibit the use of Rapido or other ILL systems.

...