Study Group Session 85: General Question and Answer, Resource Sharing Office Hours

Study Group Session 85: General Question and Answer, Resource Sharing Office Hours

Session Notes

Rebecca Pearson, Lambton and Aimee Jeffrey, Conestoga: Resource Sharing TOU Update

  • Page 1+ Lending Rule has been updated to 3 weeks and redistributed from the NZ: travel time and hold shelf time built into the due date; loan may not actually be 14 days days

  • Travis Winwood, Algonquin - Renewals: when a patron requests a renewal, they would get a 3 week loan renewal?

    • Rebecca:

      • there are 2 steps to a renewal: patron requests renewal, staff forwards renewal request to partner

      • when staff submit the renew request to the partner, the default populated will be 3 weeks, but can build it into workflow to only request 2 additional weeks from your partner

      • do not recommend adding time to the renewal, because if you accidentally renew past the maximum renew date, that request will be rejected automatically

  • Erin Williams, Fanshawe: are all of these changes coming from the NZ or do we need to make changes to local configurations?

    • Rebecca:

      • lending TOU have been updated and redistributed from the NZ

      • if you don’t agree with this change, can create a different lending TOU in your IZ, please don’t edit the NZ TOU

    • Liana Giovando, OCLS: Clarification re lending policies:

      • colleges all have flexibility to determine how long their own material can be leant for, but as the borrowing library, can’t ask for a period longer than the lending library has allowed their materials to go out for

      • can make a special relationship with that library and set you up separately with different TOUs

      • We will be creating an Idea Exchange Proposal for Ex Libris to address this behaviour and will ask everyone to vote for it

  • Other RS Idea Exchange proposals to vote for:

Diana Borges, OCLS: Other changes made in the NZ

  • Active Resource Sharing Request Limit reverted to 5

    • Seneca added as a partner and to the GTA Rota Template

Kimberly Daigneau, St Clair: addressFrom labels for resource sharing letters

I've set our preferred library address in the "addressFrom" label for all the resource-sharing letters. Additionally, we have the rs_use_addressfrom_param marked as true. Is it acceptable to have both set this way, or will including the address in the letter labels override or conflict with the rs_use_addressfrom_param setting?

  • For resource sharing letters, the From: address contains the library's preferred email address, if this address is configured. If the address is not configured, the letters use ILL@exlibrisgroup.com as the From address. In addition, some letters may be sent from either the letter configuration from the addressFrom or the preferred e-mail address set up in the library information page for your resource sharing library, based on the value of the rs_use_addressfrom_letter_param. The letters affected by this parameter include the Ful Incoming Slip Letter, Query To Patron Letter, Resource Sharing Request Confirmation Letter, Resource Sharing Return Slip Letter, Resource Sharing Shipping Slip Letter. For a full list, please refer to the Ex Libris documentation.

Project Documentation: Physical Resource Sharing | Resource Sharing Configuring an Existing Resource Sharing Library for College... p. 38

Project Documentation: Physical Resource Sharing | Resource Sharing Configuring a Virtual Resource Sharing Library for Colleges ... p. 57

  • Letters are getting caught in their , spam filter

Aimee Jeffrey, Conestoga

  • Conestoga kept the original Ex Libris group e-mail in the addressfrom label (just changed it to indicate it was a Conestoga library e-mail)

  • did not change the label the preferred e-mail address

  • then added own internal e-mail in their cc label

  • needs to come from Ex Libris e-mail because otherwise the spam filter thinks it’s junk

Rebecca Pearson, Lambton

  • your choice whether to add cc or work with IT to get the proper ILL e-mail working

  • Lambton was able to work with their IT to get their proper library e-mail to work without using the cc label/patrons using Reply All

Erin Williams: Fanshawe will be slightly delayed with soft launch

  • hoping to be ready for soft launch next week

Kimberly: has everyone set up query to patron letter?

Erin: have any of the draft staff workflows been updated?

  • Aimee: no, they are pretty much done in terms of generalized instructions

  • Rebecca: the renew section will be something to update

Amanda Van Mierlo, Humber: was the issue with the addresses in the Resource Sharing Shipping Slip fixed?

  • XML code solutions recommended:

Travis' recommendation in the Page 1+ Community Discussion Forum: https://clo-collaboration-spaces.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DFT/customcontent/list/ac%3Aquestions-answers-for-confluence%3Aquestion?ac.questions-answers-for-confluence.path=/questions/1484488727

Daniel’s recommendation in the Humber College Discussion page: Re: Humber - Discussion Page | Comment

  • code worked for Humber

  • seems like you can just use line 1, 2, 3 of the address instead of the province field, so anyone who doesn’t want to edit the XML code can use that

SUNY Letter Customization:

Is there a central repository for sharing customized letters? - FAQs

Amanda: has anyone else opted into being an early tester for the new user interface?

  • Humber will opt into being an early adopter

  • Erin:

    • also keeping an eye on that

    • Fanshawe has not opted in for early testing

    • optional feature rollout in November, by February rolling out for everyone

  • Liana:

    • Stacey and Jennifer from OCLS opting in for Sandbox that OCLS has access to and would like to work with Humber on it

Liana: Who is still working on RS configurations or ready?

  • Fanshawe - configs done, just working on staff workflow and documentation; all settings left enabled from testing but marked as testing and no requests have come through yet

  • 4 attendees have gone through the final steps

  • take opportunity to practice between now and the fall

Diana: converting RS requests to PR, or PR to RS

  • For the convert a RS request to a PR, that should be possible, but Ex Libris looking into where the option gets turned on so that it displays in the dropdown list for the borrowing request.

  • For the PR convert to RS request would be an enhancement request.

  • Colleges can use Display Logic Rules to control whether the RS request option appears in records for electronic resources e.g.

 

Display logic rule.png

 

Rebecca Pearson: access to EBSCO ebooks purchased through Rialto in Primo VE

  • eresource service set up

  • view it section is showing up in the Primo VE records

  • service is activated from the vendor’s perspective, title is accessible from the database

  • when click on view online, takes patron to database page with a message that the record could not be found - database page authenticated

  • portfolios are active

  • this is the collection that EBSCO set up for Rialto orders to go into, but they did not set up a service for this collection so Rebecca started setting up the service

  • Lambton purchased 2 titles and just the titles were showing up in Primo VE, no access

  • EBooks managed by the NZ work fine

  • Terri Duff, Fleming:

    • had something happen for them with Rialto, EBSCO admin login

    • Do you have jobs running for the new orders?

  • Erin and Terri: follow up with Rialto through chat or submit a case

  • Travis and Brenda Desjardins, St Lawrence will send Rebecca screenshots of their set up for these EBooks

Liana: RS meetings

  • another RS check in meeting on July 23, 11 a.m. - 12 p.m.

  • eventually will start rolling out a communications plan for promoting resource sharing with patrons in the fall, will start discussing this at the meeting next week and then leave time for questions

Recording