Attendees

1. Dijana Kladnjakovic (Co-Chair), Humber College

2. Stacey Boileau (Co-Chair), OCLS

3. Irene Sillius, Sheridan College

4. Mellissa Forget, St. Clair College

5. Sarah Gillard, George Brown College

6. Susan Lee, Conestoga College

7. Rosina Leung, Seneca College

8. Kit Robertson, Northern College

9. Callen Retter, Confederation College

10. Tiffany Miller, Confederation College

11. Jasper Romo, Georgian College

12. Mary-Margaret Mirtsos, Centennial College

13. Najeeb Ahmed, Humber College

14. Angela Ashton, Lambton College

15. Kent Reynolds, Niagara College

16. Danielle Emon, Consultant

17. Liana Giovando, OCLS

18. Aura Hill, OCLS

Regrets

1. Carrie Cousineau, St. Lawrence College

Action Items from Previous Meeting

• Dijana KladnjakovicStacey Boileau to update streaming video standards in the new table by Friday May 6 and share with group, as well as a new tab for streaming audio standards.
• Everyone review and respond to new streaming video standards in table by Wed May 11.
• For all subcommittee members:

1. Compare bibliographic minimum standards for streaming audio with Primo VE requirements and see if we are matching the Primo VE requirements. Identify any specific differences.

2. Review streaming audio records, if any, in Audio Cine Films, Curio, and Criterion on Demand, - and see what is being done on top of the minimum standards on a local level.

3. Use the Backgrounder on Minimum Bibliographic Standards and https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/020Primo_VE/Primo_VE_(English)/120Other_Configurations/Mapping_to_the_Display%2C_Facets%2C_and_Search_Sections_in_the_Primo_VE_Record#Resource_Type_Mapping for your comparison.

4. Please capture notes/results/recommendations in the shared Excel/Google doc on the appropriate tab.

• Dijana Kladnjakovic to share results of review of OCLC records. Everyone to review and prepare for discussion at next meeting.

Discussion Items

• Subcommittee Chair Update from ISC

• Evaluation of Conexxion Results (Sarah)

• Decision to set brief record rules in the NZ that will dictate the minimum required fields necessary in order for a new record to be contributed to the NZ (if a match is not found when running the linking job).

• Questions that came out of Study Group:

  • Would like clarity on relationship between Local Tagging - Manual Bib Edits May Be Required, Network Zone and Local Fields Best Practices and Briefing Note 06 - Consortial Treatment of LC Subject Headings

  • Is there impact to colleges Migration Form?

  • Is moving 650 to 690 enough to preserve local heading or do we need another process to create a local authority file in the NZ (so other colleges could use subject headings)?

• Planning for session on local fields and cataloguing in the consortium

• Any other business