These FAQ are drawn from RSWG Q&As held February 28th and March 4th.
Staff Time and Financial Considerations
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
There is no change to the Alma Software as a Service Subscription Agreement if colleges choose to implement resource sharing using the Peer-to-Peer or the Fulfillment Network models. Colleges may wish to implement additional software in the future that would incur additional costs, but the two models under consideration at this stage do not change the current subscription fee. If resource sharing requests increase, there may be an impact on the cost of shipping items. In addition, more staff time may also be required to fulfill borrowing and lending requests if there is a higher volume of requests across the system as a result of resource sharing in Alma. Note that every institution has the option to deny any request or opt out of resource sharing at any point. This is true with both the P2P and FN model. |
...
title | Should we expect a higher volume of requests if we implement resource sharing with Alma? |
---|
It is possible that resource sharing requests will become more frequent with both models, P2P and FN. OCUL saw a marked increase in resource sharing requests when they implemented an Automated Fulfillment Network. They also found that individual collections with low circulation were used more frequently once other institutions were able to borrow materials more easily.
...
Don't Call It A Comeback: OLA RS Presentation: https://clo-collaboration-spaces.atlassian.net/wiki/x/IoD1R
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
There are multiple options for handling the cost of shipping. Many variations were seen among other consortia interviewed for this project. Some have a pool of money that everyone contributes to and can then make use of for shipping fees. One example of this is PASCAL. In other cases such as ILLNET, grant money is used to pay for the cost of shipping. Others agree that the library doing the shipping pays, so the lending library pays to ship it one way and the borrowing library pays to ship it back. Others agree that the borrowing library pays for both sending and returning. The Ontario colleges that agree to participate in consortial resource sharing supported by Alma will need to decide on how shipping will be handled. Once we decide on a model for resource sharing, we will move on to working out the details of handling shipping fees. The cost of shipping does not change based on which resource sharing model in Alma (P2P or FN) is selected. |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
P2P It is relatively simple to apply Alma configuration changes in support of a P2P model. Each participating institution will be provided with a brief set of instructions for making any necessary changes in Alma. It is expected this process will take one staff member with Alma training no more than a day. It may take additional time for individual institutions to update internal ILL practices if local workflows need to be changed as a result of Alma. The P2P model is similar enough to current ILL practices that the RSWG does not anticipate a major time commitment for updating local workflows. Fulfillment Network The Fulfillment Network configuration settings are more complicated and will take more time for staff members to apply in Alma. It will also take additional time to prepare local training documentation and ready front-line staff for resource sharing in a Fulfillment Network. Due to the complexities of a Fulfillment Network, it is expected that the implementation of resource sharing in Alma will be delayed by three to six months if the colleges opt for a Fulfillment Network model. Big Decisions It will likely take time for the colleges to agree on key decisions such as shipping fees, lending policies and fees/fines. It is difficult to determine exactly how much individual staff time will be required to make these decisions. This time will be needed regardless of the resource sharing model selected. |
...
title | How much staff time is required to manage resource sharing requests day-to-day with each model? |
---|
P2P Workflow (Example of tasks with time requirements example)
Borrowing institution automatically locates best potential supplier though configured rota in Alma.
Patron puts in a request from Primo VE.
A request is sent to the lending institution from the borrowing institution in Alma.
...
These FAQ are drawn from RSWG Q&As held February 28th and March 4th.
Staff Time and Financial Considerations
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
If resource sharing requests increase, there may be an impact on the cost of shipping items. In addition, more staff time may be required to fulfill borrowing and lending requests if there is a higher volume of requests across the system as a result of resource sharing in Alma. Note that every institution has the option to deny any request or opt out of resource sharing at any point. This is true with both the P2P and FN model. There is no change to the Alma Software as a Service Subscription Agreement if colleges choose to implement resource sharing using the Peer-to-Peer or the Fulfillment Network models. Colleges may wish to implement additional software in the future that would incur additional costs, but the two models under consideration at this stage do not change the current subscription fee. |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
It is possible that resource sharing requests will become more frequent with both models, P2P and FN. OCUL saw a marked increase in resource sharing requests when they implemented an Automated Fulfillment Network. They also found that individual collections with low circulation were used more frequently once other institutions were able to borrow materials more easily.
|
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
There are multiple options for handling the cost of shipping. Many variations were seen among other consortia interviewed for this project. Some have a pool of money that everyone contributes to and can then make use of for shipping fees. One example of this is PASCAL. In other cases such as ILLNET, grant money is used to pay for the cost of shipping. Others agree that the library doing the shipping pays, so the lending library pays to ship it one way and the borrowing library pays to ship it back. Others agree that the borrowing library pays for both sending and returning. The Ontario colleges that agree to participate in consortial resource sharing supported by Alma will need to decide on how shipping will be handled. Once we decide on a model for resource sharing, we will move on to working out the details of handling shipping fees. The cost of shipping does not change based on which resource sharing model in Alma (P2P or FN) is selected. |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
P2P It is relatively simple to apply Alma configuration changes in support of a P2P model. Each participating institution will be provided with a brief set of instructions for making any necessary changes in Alma. It is expected this process will take one staff member with Alma training no more than a day. It may take additional time for individual institutions to update internal ILL practices if local workflows need to be changed as a result of Alma. The P2P model is similar enough to current ILL practices that the RSWG does not anticipate a major time commitment for updating local workflows. Fulfillment Network The Fulfillment Network configuration settings are more complicated and will take more time for staff members to apply in Alma. It will also take additional time to prepare local training documentation and ready front-line staff for resource sharing in a Fulfillment Network. Due to the complexities of a Fulfillment Network, it is expected that the implementation of resource sharing in Alma will be delayed by three to six months if the colleges opt for a Fulfillment Network model. Big Decisions It will likely take time for the colleges to agree on key decisions such as shipping fees, lending policies and fees/fines. It is difficult to determine exactly how much individual staff time will be required to make these decisions. This time will be needed regardless of the resource sharing model selected. |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
P2P Workflow (Example of tasks with time requirements example)
To fulfill request:
NOTE: The finding and pulling of items are the most time-consuming part in this step. As an example, we ran a regular hold from start to finish to see how long the process would take a staff member. The results came back as needing 5 minutes from the moment the hold comes into Alma to the staff member placing it on the hold shelf/moving onto step 3.
NOTE: Depending on each institution, this may be a daily prosses or multiple times a day, etc.
To return the item to lending institution:
NOTE: Depending on each institution, this may be a daily prosses or multiple times a day, etc. Fulfillment Network Workflow (Example of tasks with time requirements example)
To fulfill request: Print out request slips. 1 minute Locate and pull the item. It will take 1-10 minutes, depending on the number of items and the size of the library/where the item is located. Scan in item. 1-3 minutes, depending on the number of items. request:
NOTE: The finding and pulling of items are the most time-consuming part in this step. As an example, we ran a regular hold from start to finish to see how long the process would take a staff member. The results came back as needing 5 minutes from the moment the hold comes into Alma to the staff member placing it on the hold shelf/moving onto step 3.
NOTE: Depending on each institution, this may be a daily prosses or multiple times a day, etc.
If dropped off at patron’s pickup institution:
Then Alma will let the operator know where the item needs to go, and the process just repeats itself, but in reverse.
To return the item to lending institution:
Fulfillment Network Workflow (Example of tasks with time requirements example)The RSWG expects the same amount of staff time will be needed to complete an individual resource sharing request using the P2P model in Alma as is needed to fulfill a traditional ILL request now. It is expected that less staff time will be required to complete resource sharing requests using a Fulfillment Network model. There may be added demand on staff time if the frequency of requests increases do to the ease of access. Note that every institution has the option to deny any request or opt out of resource sharing at any point. This is true with both the P2P and FN model. |
...
Expand | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
Please see the documentation listed below for details on the transfer of patron data in a Fulfillment Network model. |
...
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
In a P2P model, requests go to a borrowing and lending requests listlists, rather than holds. In an FN, requests will work similarly to internal Patron hold requests. They will be pulled for a hold from a “pick from shelf” procedure, and routed to the ILL dept for processing. Both local and fulfillment network holds will be included in the Active Hold Shelf in Alma. However, a local hold will have more options than a fulfillment network hold (in addition to "Update Expiry" and "View Audit Trail," you may see "Cancel Request" and "Mark as Missing”). When it arrives at the borrowing library, the item will be scanned in and routed to the requested “campus” or “Library” as with regular physical patron requests. A receipt can be printed for in transit process. An email is sent to the patron when an item is ready for pickup.
|
...
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Digital lending can be supported in the P2P model through the creation of digitization requests and Alma’s Document Delivery window. Once the files are added Alma verifies the sending parameters based on the digitization and copyright rules. Specific terms for digital terms of use can be configured and attached to the borrower request. Files can be delivered directly to the patron’s e-mail address or through staff mediation.
|
...