Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Liana Giovando

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Liana Giovando

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  •  All Subcommittee Chairs are asked to complete a draft terms of reference using the templates provided on the main Subcommittee page of Confluence, due July 13th: Implementation Committees
  •  Liana to add “Expectations” to templateTOR templates.
  •  Liana to revise the Best Practices page into an Overview of Subcommittee roles and expectations. Best Practices for Committee and Subcommittee Chairs Using Confluence
  •  ISC members to encourage members of their institution to prepare questions for the Ex Libris Privacy, Security and Compliance Information Session and send them to Liana so they may be delivered to Ex Libris in advance.
  •  Thomas and Liana to transcribe points outlined in proposed Annex E/I into questions we can propose to Ex Libris in the July 13th session.
  •  Liana and Stacey to identify pre-implementation tasks that will be managed by OCLS on behalf of SIRSI colleges.Implementation Committees
  •  Liana to revise the Best Practices page into an Overview of Subcommittee roles and expectations. Best Practices for Committee and Subcommittee Chairs Using Confluence

Discussion Items

  • Recap of Ex Libris Information Session - any impact on Annex I & J ?

  • Update on contract negotiations

  • Including Seneca and Loyalist

  • Review Draft Danielle’s Comments on ANNEX E (document sent separately by email)

  • Decision Making Framework for Committees Decision Making Framework for the Committees

  • Subcommittee Terms of Reference Discussion

  • Signed Participation MOU’s: Signed Participation MOU's

    • Jess and David will reach out to any who have not sent signed documents.

    • Is it ok if I make these pages available to all?

  • Communication

News about the selection of ExLibris was communicated to college directors but apparently it didn’t make its way to all staff at the colleges. David has received note from some college staff at the bibliographic standard working group who are asking about the status of the project. Seems like a broad communication is required. Action:          David and Jess to add a note to the message sent to request college liaison informing everyone on the vendor selection, noting that this is still college internal.

  • Including Seneca and LoyalistSubcommittee Terms of Reference Discussion

  • (Time permitting) Communication

  • (Time permitting) Review Draft Decision Making Framework for Committees