...
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Alma can be configured to require a patron to register before requesting an item from another library. This ensures the patron is made aware that their personal information will be shared with another institution and give consent if they wish to proceed.
|
...
Digital and Electronic Resource Sharing Questions
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
Expand | ||
| ||
| ||
The RSWG will share a resource sharing proposal based our research and on feedback from Q&As. The proposal will be delivered by email to the CLO member of each college on March 11th. CLO members will have one week to reply with additional concerns or questions. We will ask each CLO member to indicate the intention of their institution to participate in the proposed model by March 18th. |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
It is possible but not encouraged for some colleges to opt for a P2P model while others go with an FN. This is an arrangement that is physically possible in Alma but will require a great deal more time and effort to configure. It would delay implementation if this were the choice of the colleges. |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Yes, every institution has the option to deny any request or opt out of resource sharing at any point. This is true with both the P2P and FN model. |
Digital and Electronic Resource Sharing Questions
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Both models are designed to support physical resource sharing rather than sharing electronic or digital items. A P2P model can support digital resource sharing as well as a limited number of electronic resource sharing requests. |
| |
Both models are designed to support physical resource sharing rather than sharing electronic or digital items. A P2P model can support digital resource sharing as well as a limited number of electronic resource sharing requests. |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Digital lending can be supported in the P2P model through the creation of digitization requests and Alma’s Document Delivery window. Once the files are added Alma verifies the sending parameters based on the digitization and copyright rules. Specific terms for digital terms of use can be configured and attached to the borrower request. Files can be delivered directly to the patron’s e-mail address or through staff mediation. | ||
Expand | ||
| ||
Yes, we have been in contact with OCUL. They are keen to move forward with the Ontario colleges once we have established our internal network zone scenario for resource sharing
|
Outside RS Partners including OCUL
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
No, we could connect with other institutions outside of the Network Zone through P2P or FN. |
Outside RS Partners including OCUL
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
No, we could connect with other institutions outside of the Network Zone through P2P or FN. |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Yes, we have been in contact with OCUL. They are keen to move forward with the Ontario colleges once we have established our internal network zone scenario for resource sharing. |
Proposal Process Questions
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
The RSWG will share a resource sharing proposal based our research and on feedback from Q&As. The proposal will be delivered by email to the CLO member of each college on March 11th. CLO members will have one week to reply with additional concerns or questions. We will ask each CLO member to indicate the intention of their institution to participate in the proposed model by March 18th. |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
It is possible but not encouraged for some colleges to opt for a P2P model while others go with an FN. This is an arrangement that is physically possible in Alma but will require a great deal more time and effort to configure. It would delay implementation if this were the choice of the colleges. |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Yes, every institution has the option to deny any request or opt out of resource sharing at any point. This is true with both the P2P and FN model. |
Additional Questions
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
For additional questions, please email:
|
...